Abbott Andrew, (2001), Time Matters: On Theory and Method, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Adams Julia, Clemens Elisabeth S., & Ann Shola Orloff, (2005), “Introduction: Social Theory, Modernity, and the Three Waves of Historical Sociology,” in Remaking Modernity: Politics, History, and Sociology, Durham, NC, Duke University Press.
Ansell Christopher, (2011), Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy, New York, Oxford University Press.
Baert Patrick, (2005), “Towards a Pragmatist-Inspired Philosophy of Social Science,” Acta Sociologica, 48, 3, 191-203.
Baldwin John D., (1988), “The Matter of Habit and G. H. Mead: Comment on Camic,” American Journal of Sociology, 93, 4, 952-7.
Baumgarten Eduard, (1936), “John Dewey I: Die Idee der Demokratie,” Internationale Zeitschrift für Erziehung, 5, 81-96.
Baumgarten Eduard, (1938), Der Pragmatismus: R. W. Emerson, W. James, J. Dewey, Vol. II, Frankfurt a. M., V. Klostermann.
Becker Howard, (1976), Sociological Work: Method and Substance, New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction Publishers.
Bergmann Werner, (1981), “Zeit, Handlung und Sozialität bei G. H. Mead,” Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 10, 4, 351-63.
Blumer Herbert, (1969), Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
Blumer Herbert, (1990), Industrialization as an Agent of Social Change: A Critical Analysis, edited by David R. Maines & Thomas J. Morrione, New York, Aldine de Gruyter.
Bourgeois Patrick, & Sandra B. Rosenthal, (1990), “Scientific Time and the Temporal Sense of Human Existence: Merleau-Ponty and Mead,” Research in Phenomenology, 20, 1, 152-63.
Bourgeois Patrick, & Sandra B. Rosenthal, (1993), “The Present as the Seat of Temporal Existence: Merleau-Ponty and Mead,” International Studies in Philosophy, 25 (3), 1-15.
Brogaard Berit O., (1999), “Mead’s Temporal Realism,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 35, 3, 563-93.
Camic Charles, (2016), “Changing ‘Movements of Thought in the Nineteenth Century’: Historical Text and Historical Context,” in The Timeliness of George Herbert Mead, edited by Hans Joas & Daniel R. Huebner, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Campbell James, (2013), “Mead’s Understanding of Movements of Thought,” in George Herbert Mead in the Twenty-first Century, edited by F. Thomas Burke & Krzysztof Skowronski, Lanham, MD, Lexington Books.
Carreira da Silva Filipe, (2008), Mead and Modernity: Science, Selfhood, and Democratic Politics, Lanham, MD, Lexington Books.
Castell Alburey, (1937), “[Review] Movements of Thought in the Nineteenth Century, by George H. Mead,” Journal of Modern History, 9, 1, 86-8.
Child Arthur, (1941), “The Problem of Imputation in the Sociology of Knowledge,” Ethics, 51, 2, 200-19.
Collingwood R. G., (1956), The Idea of History, New York, Oxford University Press.
Collingwood R. G., (1999), The Principles of History and Other Writings in Philosophy of History, edited by W. H. Gray & W. J. van der Dussen, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Cook Gary A., (1979), “Whitehead’s Influence on the Thought of G. H. Mead,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 15, 2, 107-31.
Cook Gary A., (1992), “George Herbert Mead: An Unpublished Essay on Royce and James,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 28, 3, 583-92.
Côté Jean-François, (2013), “George Herbert Mead on Ancient Greek Society: An Introduction,” Canadian Journal of Sociology, 38, 3, 383-405.
Côté Jean-François, (2015), George Herbert Mead’s Concept of Society: A Critical Reconstruction, Boulder, CO, Paradigm Publishers.
Deegan Mary Jo, (2011), Self, War, and Society: George Herbert Mead’s Macrosociology, New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction Publishers.
Dewey John, (1997), The Correspondence of John Dewey, 3 Vols., edited by Larry Hickman, Charlottesville, VA, InteLex Past Masters.
Drake Durant, Lovejoy Arthur O., Pratt James B., Rogers Arthur K., Santayana George, Sellars Roy Wood, & C. A. Strong, (1920), Essays in Critical Realism: A Co-operative Study of the Problem of Knowledge, London, Macmillan and Co.
Durkheim Émile, (1983 [1913/14]), Pragmatism and Sociology, translated by J. C. Whitehouse, edited by John B. Allcock, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Eames Elizabeth R., (1973), “Mead’s Concept of Time,” in The Philosophy of G. H. Mead, edited by W. R. Corti, Winterthur, Switzerland, Amriswiler Bücherei.
Effelberger Hans, (1936), “Die Gegenwartsbedeutung der amerikanischen Philosophie,” Die neueren Sprachen 44, 487-96.
Fen Sing-Nan, (1951), “Present and Re-Presentation: A Discussion of Mead’s Philosophy of the Present,” Philosophical Review, 60, 545-50.
Flaherty Michael G., & Gary Alan Fine, (2001), “Present, Past, and Future: Conjugating George Herbert Mead’s Perspective on Time,” Time and Society, 10, 147-61.
Frings Manfred S., (1983), “Social Temporality in George Herbert Mead and Scheler,” Philosophy Today, 27, 281-9.
Garcia Ruiz Alicia, (2013), “The Concept of the Present and Historical Experience,” in George Herbert Mead in the Twenty-first Century, edited by F. Thomas Burke & Krzysztof Skowronski, Lanham, MD, Lexington Books.
Gehlen Arnold, (1951), “Der Gegenwärtige Stand der anthropologischen Forschung,” Merkur: deutsche Zeitschrift für europäisches Denken, 38, 379-89.
Gross Neil, (2009), “A Pragmatist Theory of Social Mechanisms,” American Sociological Review, 74, 3, 358-79.
Gross Neil, (2010), “Charles Tilly and American Pragmatism,” The American Sociologist, 41, 4, 337-57.
Herman Thelma, (1944), “Pragmatism: A Study in Middle-Class Ideology,” Social Forces, 22, 4, 405-10.
Holt B. Edwin, Marvin Walter T., Montague W. P., Perry Ralph B., Pitkin. Walter B, & E. G. Spaulding, (1912), The New Realism: Cooperative Studies in Philosophy, New York, Macmillan.
Huebner Daniel R., (2013), “Wilhelm Jerusalem’s Sociology of Knowledge in the Dialogue of Ideas,” Journal of Classical Sociology, 13, 4, 430-59.
Huebner Daniel R., (2014), Becoming Mead: The Social Process of Academic Knowledge, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Huebner Daniel R., (2016), “On Mead’s Long Lost History of Science,” in The Timeliness of George Herbert Mead, edited by Hans Joas & Daniel R. Huebner, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Jerusalem Wilhelm, (1909), “Die Aufgabe der Soziologie,” Monatsschrift für Soziologie, 1, 7, 550-8.
Joas Hans, (1985), G. H. Mead: A Contemporary Re-examination of His Thought, 2nd rev. ed. 1997, translated by Raymond Meyer, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Joas Hans, (1993), Pragmatism and Social Theory, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Joas Hans, (1996), The Creativity of Action, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Joas Hans, (2013), The Sacredness of the Person: A New Genealogy of Human Rights, Washington, DC, Georgetown University Press.
Joas Hans, (2016), “Pragmatism and Historicism: Mead’s Philosophy of Temporality and the Logic of Historiography,” in The Timeliness of George Herbert Mead, edited by Hans Joas & Daniel R. Huebner, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Joas Hans, & Daniel R. Huebner, (eds.), (2016), The Timeliness of George Herbert Mead, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Leahy Daniel J., (1953), “A Pragmatic Theory of Past, Present and Future,” Review of Metaphysics, 6, 3, 369-80.
Lee Harold N., (1963), “Mead’s Doctrine of the Past,” Tulane Studies in Philosophy, 12, 52-75.
Lovejoy Arthur O., (1939), “Present Standpoints and Past History,” Journal of Philosophy, 36, 18, 477-89.
Maines David R., (1993), “Narrative’s Moment and Sociology’s Phenomena: Toward a Narrative Sociology,” Sociological Quarterly, 34, 1, 17-38.
Maines David R, Sugrue Noreen M., & Michael A. Katovich, (1983), “The Sociological Import of G. H. Mead’s Theory of the Past,” American Sociological Review, 48, 2, 161-73.
Mandelbaum Maurice, (1948), “Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Theory of Historiography,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 9, 4, 412-23.
Mannheim Karl, (1936 [1929]), Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge, translated by Louis Wirth & Edward A. Shils, New York, Harcourt Brace.
Margolis Joseph, (1986), Pragmatism Without Foundations: Reconciling Realism and Relativism, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
Margolis Joseph, (2002), Reinventing Pragmatism: American Philosophy at the End of the Twentieth Century, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.
Margolis Joseph, (2006), “Pluralism, Relativism, and Historicism,” in A Companion to Pragmatism, edited by John R. Shook & Joseph Margolis, Malden, MA, Blackwell Publishing.
Mead George H., (1896), “Some Aspects of Greek Philosophy,” University of Chicago Record 1, 42.
Mead George H., (1897), “[Review] Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Ontologie des Menschlichen Geistes by Dr. G. Class,” American Journal of Theology 1, 789-92.
Mead George H., (1899), “The Working Hypothesis in Social Reform,” American Journal of Sociology 5, 404-12.
Mead George H., (1908), “The Philosophical Basis of Ethics,” International Journal of Ethics 18, 311-23.
Mead George H., (1910), “Untitled response to a paper by Professor Robinson,” in Box 14, Folder 1, George Herbert Mead Papers, 1883-1964, Special Collections Research Center, Joseph P. Regenstein Library, University of Chicago.
Mead George H., (1915a), “Natural Rights and the Theory of the Political Institution,” Journal of Philosophy 12, 141-55.
Mead George H., (1915b), “The Psychological Bases of Internationalism,” Survey 33, 604-7.
Mead George H., (1917a), “Scientific Method and Individual Thinker,” in Creative Intelligence: Essays in the Pragmatic Attitude, edited by John Dewey et al., New York, Henry Holt and Co.
Mead George H., (1917b), “Josiah Royce – A Personal Impression,” International Journal of Ethics 27, 168-70.
Mead George H., (1923), “Scientific Method and the Moral Sciences,” International Journal and Ethics 23, 229-47.
Mead George H., (1929a), “The Nature of the Past,” in Essays in Honor of John Dewey, edited by John Coss, New York, Henry Holt.
Mead George H., (1929b), “National-Mindedness and International-Mindedness,” International Journal of Ethics 39, 385-407.
Mead George H., (1929c), “A Pragmatic Theory of Truth,” University of California Publications in Philosophy 11, 65-88.
Mead George H., (1930), “The Philosophies of Royce, James, and Dewey in Their American Setting,” International Journal of Ethics 40, 211-31.
Mead George H., (1932), The Philosophy of the Present, edited by Arthur E. Murphy, Chicago, Open Court.
Mead George H., (1935), “The Philosophy of John Dewey,” International Journal of Ethics 46, 64-81.
Mead George H., (1936), Movements of Thought in the Nineteenth Century, edited by Merritt H. Moore, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Mead George H., (1938), The Philosophy of the Act, edited by Charles W. Morris, John M. Brewster, Albert M. Dunham, and David L. Miller, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Mead George H., (2015 [1934]), Mind, Self, and Society: The Definitive Edition, revised edition edited by Daniel R. Huebner and Hans Joas, original edition by Charles W. Morris, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Miller David L., (1943), “G. H. Mead’s Conception of the Present,” Philosophy of Science 10, 40-6.
Miller David L., (1973), George Herbert Mead: Self, Language, and the World, Austin, TX, University of Texas Press.
Mills Wright C., (1966), Sociology and Pragmatism: The Higher Learning in America, New York, Oxford University Press.
Mink Louis O., (1969), Mind, History, and Dialectic: The Philosophy of R. G. Collingwood, Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
Moore Merritt H., (1936), “Introduction,” in Movements of Thought in the Nineteenth Century, by George H. Mead, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Murphy Arthur E., (1932), “Introduction,” in The Philosophy of the Present, by G. H. Mead, Chicago, Open Court.
Murphy Arthur E., (1936), “[Review] Movements of Thought in the Nineteenth Century, by G. H. Mead,” Journal of Philosophy, 33, 14, 384-6.
Natanson Maurice, (1953), “George H. Mead’s Metaphysics of Time,” Journal of Philosophy, 50, 25, 770-82.
Nef Castle Elinor, (1953), Letters & Notes, Los Angeles, Ward Ritchie Press.
Nowotny Helga, (1992), “Time and Social Theory: Towards a Social Theory of Time,” Time and Society 1, 421-54.
O’Toole James M., & Richard J. Cox, (2006), Understanding Archives & Manuscripts, Chicago, Society of American Archivist.
Parsons Talcott, (1937), The Structure of Social Action: A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers, New York, McGraw Hill.
Powell Walter W., & Paul DiMaggio, (1991), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Rigney Ernest G., & Timothy C. Lundy, (2015), “From a Pragmatist’s Point of View: George Herbert Mead’s Unattributed Review of Theodore Merz’s A History of European Thought in the Nineteenth Century,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 7, 1, 191-203.
Scheler Max, (1926), Die Wissensformen und die Gesellschaft, Leipzig, Der Neue-geist Verlag.
Schneiderhan Erik, (2011), “Pragmatism and Empirical Sociology: The Case of Jane Addams and Hull-House, 1889-1895,” Theory and Society, 40, 6, 589-617.
Scott Richard W., (1995), Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.
Stone Jake E., (2013), “Mead’s Interpretation of Relativity Theory,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 27, 2, 153-71.
Strauss Anselm, (1991), “Mead’s Multiple Conceptions of Time and Evolution: Their Contexts and Their Consequences for Theory,” International Sociology, 6, 4, 411-26.
Thomas Michael L., (2016), “Mead, Whitehead, and the Sociality of Nature,” in The Timeliness of George Herbert Mead, edited by Hans Joas & Daniel R. Huebner, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Tillman Mary Katherine, (1970), “Temporality and Role-Taking in G. H. Mead,” Social Research, 37, 4, 533-46.
Tonness Alfred, (1933), “A Notation on the Problem of the Past – with Especial Reference to George Herbert Head,” Journal of Philosophy, 29, 22, 599-606.
Ushenko Andrew, (1934), “Discussion: Alternative Perspectives and the Invariant Space-Time,” Mind, 43, 170, 199-203.
Van der Dussen Jan, (2015), Studies on Collingwood, History and Civilization, New York, Springer.
Wagner-Pacifici Robin, (2010), “Theorizing the Restlessness of Events,” American Journal of Sociology, 115, 5, 1351-86.
Weber Max, (1946 [1917]), “Science as a Vocation,” in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by Hans H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills, New York, Oxford University Press.
West Cornel, (1989), The American Evasion of Philosophy: A Genealogy of Pragmatism, Madison, WI, University of Wisconsin Press.
Westbrook Robert, (2006), “Liberal Democracy,” in A Companion to Pragmatism, edited by John R. Shook & Joseph Margolis, Malden, MA, Blackwell Publishing.
Westbrook Robert, (2016), “George Herbert Mead and the Promise of Pragmatist Democracy,” in The Timeliness of George Herbert Mead, edited by Hans Joas and Daniel R. Huebner, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Williams Donald C., (1934), “The Argument for Realism,” The Monist, 44, 2, 186-209.