Albrecht J. M., (2012), Reconstructing Individualism: A Pragmatic Tradition from Emerson to Ellison, New York, Fordham University Press.
Alschuler A. W., (1997), “Descending Trail: Holmes’ Path of the Law One Hundred Years Later,” Florida Law Review 49, 353-420.
Alschuler A. W., (2000), Law Without Values: The Life, Work, and Legacy of Justice Holmes, Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press.
Bader W. D., (1994-5), “Some Thoughts on Blackstone, Precedent, and Originalism,” Vermont Law Review 19, 5-18.
Baker L., (1991), The Justice from Beacon Hill: The Life and Times of Oliver Wendell Holmes, New York, HarperCollins.
Balkin J. M., (2012), “The Roots of the Living Constitution,” Boston University Law Review 92, 1129-1160.
Bernstein D. E., (2003), “Lochner’s Legacy’s Legacy,” Texas Law Review 82, 1-64.
Blackstone W, (1966), Commentaries on the Laws of England, Book the First, 1765, London, Dawsons of Pall Mall.
Blasi V., (2004), “Holmes and the Marketplace of Ideas,” Supreme Court Review, 1-45.
Brown R. B. & B. A. Kimball (2001), “When Holmes Borrowed from Langdell: The Ultra Legal Formalism and Public Policy of Northern Securities (1904),” American Journal of Legal History 45, 278-321.
Burke K., (1952), A Grammar of Motives, Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Chroust A., (1949), “Blackstone Revisited,” University of Kansas City Law Review 17, 24-34.
Coke S. E., (2003), The Selected Speeches and Writings of Sir Edward Coke, S. Sheppard, ed., Indianapolis, Indiana, Liberty Fund.
Darling v. City of Newport (1919), 249 U.S. 540.
Emerson R. W., (1883), “Divinity School Address,” in The Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson, Boston, Jefferson Press.
Emerson R. W., (1983), “Circles” and “Nature,” in Essays and Lectures, J. Porte, ed., New York, Library of America.
Emerson R. W., (1996), “Art,” “The American Scholar,” “Plato; or, The Philosopher,” in Emerson’s Essays & Poems, J. Porte, H. Bloom, & P. Kane, eds., New York, Library of America.
Fisher L. E., (2001), “Pragmatism Is as Pragmatism Does: Of Posner, Public Policy, and Empirical Reality,” New Mexico Law Review 31, 455-492.
Friedman B., (2001), “History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Three: The Lesson of Lochner,” New York University Law Review 76, 1383-1455.
Gordon R. W., (1981-82), “Holmes’s Common Law as Legal and Social Science,” Hofstra Law Review 10, 719-746.
Gordon R. W., (1992), “Introduction,” The Legacy of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., R. W. Gordon, ed., Stanford, California, Stanford University Press.
Gordon R. W., (1996), “The Struggle Over the Past,” Cleveland State Law Review 44, 123-144.
Gregg P. L., (1942-43), “The Pragmatism of Mr. Justice Holmes,” Georgetown Law Journal 31, 262-295.
Grey T. C., (1978), “Origins of the Unwritten Constitution,” Stanford Law Review 30, 843-893.
Grey T. C., (1989), “Holmes and Legal Pragmatism,” Stanford Law Review 41, 787-870.
Haack S., (2005), “On Legal Pragmatism: Where Does ‘The Path of the Law’ Lead Us?,” American Journal of Jurisprudence 50, 71-105.
Haack S., (2008), “The Pluralistic Universe of Law: Towards a Neo-Classical Legal Pragmatism,” Ratio Juris 21, 453-80.
Haack S., (2011), “Pragmatism, Law, and Morality: The Lessons of Buck v. Bell,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 3 (2), 65-87.
Hale S. M., (1713), The History of the Common Law of England, Stafford, England, J. Nutt, assignee of Edw. Sayer for J. Walthoe.
Hart Jr. H. M., (1951), “Holmes’ Positivism – An Addendum,” Harvard Law Review 64, 929-937.
Holmes Jr. O. W., (1880), “Book Notices,” The American Law Review 14, 233-35.
Holmes Jr. O. W., (1881), The Common Law, Chicago, American Bar Association.
Holmes Jr. O. W., (1897), “The Path of the Law,” Harvard Law Review 110, 457-478.
Holmes Jr. O. W., Letter to A.G. Sedgwick, 12 July 1879, quoted in R. W. Gordon (1981), “Holmes’ Common Law as Legal and Social Science,” Hofstra Law Review 10, 719-746.
Howe M. D., (1950-1), “Holmes’s Positivism – A Brief Rejoinder,” Harvard Law Review 64, 937-939.
Howe M. D., (1951), “The Positivism of Mr. Justice Holmes,” Harvard Law Review 64, 529-546.
Kellogg F. R., (2007), Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Legal Theory, and Judicial Restraint, Cambridge University Press.
Konig D., (2010), “James Madison and Common-Law Constitutionalism,” Law and History Review 28, 507-514.
“Letter to Holmes from Sir Frederick Pollock,” November 14, 1923, Harvard University Holmes Digital Suite, M. D. Howe’s research materials on Holmes, 1858-1968: Finding Aid, Complete set of typescripts, interfiled, 1923-1924.
Levine A. M. & D. S. Malachuk, (2011), A Political Companion to Ralph Waldo Emerson, Lexington, Kentucky, University of Kentucky Press.
Lobban M., (1987), “Blackstone and the Science of Law,” The Historical Journal 30, 311-335.
Matsuda M. J., (1990), “Pragmatism Modified and the False Consciousness Problem,” Southern California Law Review 63, 1763-1782.
McGrath v. Panama R. Co. (1924) 298 F. 303, 1924 A.M.C. 1328 (5th Cir. App.).
McKnight J. W., (1959), “Blackstone, Quasi-Jurisprudent,” Southwestern Law Journal 13, 399-411.
Menand L., (2001), The Metaphysical Club, New York, Farrar, Straus, Giroux.
Mendenhall A., (2010), “Jefferson’s ‘Laws of Nature’: Newtonian Influence and the Dual Valence of Jurisprudence and Science,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23, 319-334.
Mendenhall A., (2011), “Holmes and Dissent,” The Journal Jurisprudence 12, 679-726.
Mendenhall A., (2012), “Dissent as a Site of Aesthetic Adaptation in the Work of Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.,” British Journal of American Legal Studies 1, 517-550.
Meyler B., (2006), “Towards a Common Law Originalism,” Stanford Law Review 59, 551-600.
Miller J. G., (2000), “Evolutionary Statutory Interpretation: Mr. Justice Scalia Meets Darwin,” Pace Law Review 20, 409-432.
Minow M. & E. Spelman, (1990), “In Context,” Southern California Law Review 63, 1597-1652.
Nolan D. R., (1976), “Sir William Blackstone and the New American Republic: A Study of Intellectual Impact,” New York University Law Review 51, 731-768.
Novick S. M., (1989), Honorable Justice: The Life of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Little, Brown & Co.
Palmer B. W., (1945), “Hobbes, Holmes, and Hitler,” American Bar Journal 31, 569-573.
Palmer B. W., (1946), “Defense Against Leviathan,” American Bar Journal 32, 328-332.
Palmer B. W., (1951), “The Totalitarianism of Mr. Justice Holmes: Another Chapter in the Controversy,” American Bar Journal 37, 809-811.
Parker K., (2003), “The History of Experience: On the Historical Imagination of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.,” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 26, 60-82.
Pearcey N. R., (2000-1), “Darwin’s New Bulldogs: Scopes and American Legal Philosophy,” Regent University Law Review 13, 483-511.
Plucknett T. F. T., (2010), A Concise History of the Common Law, Indianapolis, Indiana, Liberty Fund, Inc.
Poirier R., (1992), Poetry and Pragmatism, London and Boston, Faber and Faber.
Posner R., (2003), Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy, Harvard University Press.
Radin M. J., (1990), “The Pragmatist and the Feminist,” Southern California Law Review 63, 1699-1726.
Rorty R., (1989-90), “The Banality of Pragmatism and the Poetry of Justice,” Southern California Law Review 63, 1811-1819.
Schanck P. C., (1992), “Understanding Postmodern Thought and Its Implications for Statutory Interpretation,” Southern California Law Review 65, 2505-2597.
Schor M., (2010-1), “Contextualizing the Debate Between Originalism and the Living Constitution,” Drake Law Review 59, 961-972.
State of Missouri v. State of Illinois (1906), 200 U.S. 496.
Steward v. American Lava Co. (1909), 215 U.S. 161.
Strasser M., (2003), “Why Theories of Law Have Little or Nothing to Do with Judicial Restraint,” Colorado Law Review 74, 1379-1408.
Strauss D., (1996), “Common Law Constitutional Interpretation,” The University of Chicago Law Review 63, 877-935.
The Essential Holmes: Selections from the Letters, Speeches, Judicial Opinions, and Other Writings of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., (1992), R. Posner, ed., Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Touster S., (1981-2), “Holmes a Hundred Years Ago: The Common Law and Legal Theory,” Hofstra Law Review 10, 673-718.
United States v. Faw (1807) 1 Cranch C.C. 456, 25 F. Cas. 1052, 1. D.C. 456, No. 15, 077 (Circuit Court, District of Columbia).
United States v. Pascacio-Rodriguez (2014) [2014 WL 1407541, April 11, 2014] (5th Circ. App.).
United States v. Willis (1808), 1 Cranch C.C. 511, 28 F. Cas. 698, 1 D.C. 511, No. 16, 728 (Circuit Court, District of Columbia).
Van Ness v. Pacard (1829), 27 U.S. (2 Pet) 137, 144.
Waterman J. S., (1932-3), “Thomas Jefferson and Blackstone’s Commentaries,” Illinois Law Review 27, 629-659.
Weisberg R. H., (1996), “It’s a Positivist, It’s a Pragmatist, It’s a Codifier! Reflections on Nietzsche and Stendhal,” Cardozo Law Review 18, 85-96.
Welch v. Tennessee Valley Authority (1939), 108 F. 2d 95 (6th Circuit).
White G. E., (1986), “Looking at Holmes in the Mirror,” Law and History Review 4, 439-466.
Wu J. C. H., (1960-1), “Justice Holmes and the Common-Law Tradition,” Vanderbilt Law Review 14, 221-238.